Friday, February 17, 2012

Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) Contract

Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) Contracts

Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation: New Grant Program

To meet the challenges of obesity, the rising incidence of chronic diseases and the aging workforce, BWC has established the Workplace Wellness Grant Program.

The program’s goal is to limit and control the escalating cost of workers’ compensation claims through addressing health risk factors. The secondary goals are to reduce health-care costs for employers, as well as improve the heath of the workforce. 

 Eligibility Requirements:
  • Be a state-fund employer
  • Current on monies owed to BWC
  • Employer does not currently have a wellness program that measures health-risk factors, and
  • Employer must contract with a third party vendor that provides these services.
BWC will provide a total of $15,000 to each employer until the grant funds are not longer available. Employers participating in the grant fund may re-ceive $300 per participating employee over a four year period.
  • Year One: $100
  • Year Two: $75
  • Year Three: $75
  • Year Four: $50
How to apply:
1. Complete all application questions.
2. Take online safety self-assessment
3. Execute the wellness program vendor contract
4. Provide vendor name
5. Submit application, safety assessment, and a copy of the wellness pro-gram vendor to contact
6. Complete and submit baseline data (Health Risk Assessments and Bio-metric Screenings) within 3 months of receiving BWC’s approval to participate in the grant program.
7. Provide receipt documents within three months of receiving grant funds.

Program participants must report data elements to BWC annually, and must submit a year-end case study that explains what they have done to create and implement their workplace wellness program.

Employers must qualify to receive these funds for the entire four-year period. To continue to receive funds for the remaining three years, the employer must complete the prior years requirements, including reporting all requested data elements and submitting the year end case study.

Employers may apply for the workplace wellness grant through an online application available at:

More information regarding the program can be found here:

Health Care Reform: Compromise on Contraceptive Coverage for Religious Employers

Compromise on Contraceptive Coverage for Religious Employers
Under health care reform, non-grandfathered health plans must cover women’s preventive care services, including contraception, without charging a co-pay or deductible. This rule is effective as soon as August 2012 for some plans.
Churches, other houses of worship and similar organizations are exempt from covering contraception on the basis of their religious objections. However, this exemption does not cover other church-affiliated institutions, such as schools, charities, hospitals and universities.
On Feb. 10, 2012, President Obama announced a proposal to address objections of non-exempt religious organizations. Under this proposal, the organization may choose whether or not to cover contraceptives. The insurance company providing coverage would be required to cover contraception if the religious organization chooses not to.
The health care reform law requires non-grandfathered health plans to cover preventive health services without imposing cost-sharing requirements, effective for plan years beginning on or after Sept. 23, 2010. In August 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued additional preventive care guidelines for women, including contraceptives, effective for plan years beginning on or after Aug. 1, 2012.
On Aug. 3, 2011, HHS issued an amendment to the women’s preventive care guidelines to allow certain non-profit religious employers offering health coverage to decide whether or not to cover contraceptive services, consistent with their beliefs. A non-profit religious employer, for this purpose, is an employer that has the inculcation of religious values as its purpose, primarily employs persons who share its religious beliefs and primarily serves persons who share its religious beliefs. This exemption covers churches and similar organizations.  
On Jan. 20, 2012, HHS announced a one-year delay to the contraceptive coverage requirement for non-profit employers that do not qualify for the exemption and do not provide contraceptive coverage to employees based on religious beliefs. Church and religious leaders objected, arguing that the coverage requirement violates their organizations’ religious freedoms and that the delay is not an adequate solution. According to the White House, the President’s proposal is an attempt to balance religious liberty with the health of women.
There will continue to be a one-year transition period for non-exempt religious organizations. During the transition period, a new regulation will be drafted. Under the new regulation, religious organizations, such as schools, charities, hospitals and universities, will not have to provide contraceptive coverage, refer their employees to organizations that provide contraception or subsidize the cost of contraception.
However, under the new regulation, female employees of these entities will receive free preventive care that includes contraceptive services. Specifically, contraception coverage will be offered to women by their employers’ insurance companies directly, free of charge, with no role for religious employers that oppose contraception.
Additional details of the policy will need to be finalized, such as how it applies to self-funded health plans. Also, the new policy does not affect existing state insurance requirements concerning contraception coverage.

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield: ERC

ERC Health

Anthem has recently rolled out with a new product in Central Ohio.  This product, at least initially, is a closed group – meaning only select Insurance Brokers can utilize.
The Anthem ERC (Employer Resource Council) is a program with certain Wellness criteria baked in.
Participating groups must agree to conduct biometric screenings and hold a health fair once per year, both of which are paid for by Anthem.
In return, members are assured that they will be part of a “healthy” pool of groups, which will ultimately help stabilize and reduce renewal increases, certainly over time.
In fact, over the past five years, 20% of ERC groups received no increase to their medical renewal, while 75% received a renewal increase of 10% or less.

Prescription Drug Patents Ending

In the next five years, there are many high-cost Brand Name prescription drugs that are coming off patent.

This is a positive development, but it is also important to note that in the first several months, or even first few years, the new generic may be expensive compared to the net cost of a brand or other alternatives. 
In fact, 50% of these generics continue to remain high cost after 18 months!

Annual Sales
$ 20 Billion
$32.5 Billion
$8.6 Billion
$ 16 Billion
$7.5 Billion
§  Caduet
§  Levaquin
§  Lipitor
§  Patanol
§  Tricor
§  Xalatan
§  Zyprexa
§  Actos
§  Avandia
§  Avapro
§  Detrol LA
§  Diovan
§  Geodon
§  Lexapro
§  Plavix
§  Provigil
§  Seroquel
§  Singulair
§  Viagra
§  AcipHex
§  Avodart
§  Cymbalta
§  Niaspan
§  OxyContin
§  Propecia
§  Sustiva
§   Actonel
§  Arthrotec
§  Asacol
§  Avelox
§  Celebrex
§  Evista
§  LoEstrin FE
§  Lunesta
§  Nexium
§  Yasmin
§  Abilify
§  Aggrenox
§  Androgel
§  Avodart
§  Axert
§  Gleevec
§  Namenda
§  Ortho Evra
§  Ortho TriCylen Lo
§  Sustiva
§  Welchol

This would be a good time to examine the alternatives with your Insurance Carrier and/or Pharmacy Benefit Manager.  It may also be a good time to structure your Rx program accordingly.

One Approach to Reducing Healthcare Costs: Benton County, Arkansas

Benton County, Arkansas realized that their healthcare costs were getting out of control, and they implemented some programs to address the issue.
Although not very popular at first with employees, the County went from $500,000 in the red to $1,000,000 in the black in just 17 months.
This CBS Evening News video is only 3 minutes long and worth the viewing.
Covenant – the vendor that helped implement the program - is a vendor of Preferred Benefits.


Wellness Return on Investment: Harvard Business Review

For many years, our industry has had a difficult time actually correlating ROI from the use of wellness dollars.
It looks like this is changing.
One of the best articles I have seen with regards to hard ROI from wellness programs comes from the Harvard Business Review. 
To summarize, the ROI on comprehensive, well-run employee wellness programs can be as high as 6-1.
For a copy of this article, please contact me directly.

Sobering Statistics: We Face a Wellness Crisis

Let’s face it.  Certain health conditions happen with every company, no matter how big or how small your organization is.  There is little that can be done to prevent a Premature Baby or a hereditary bone disorder, but many of the large claims that we see are preventable.

Let’s explore some of the staggering statistics on just two of the major contributors of health insurance claims – Obesity and Smoking:

  • More than half of all Americans live with one or more chronic condition.
  • Most adults will be overweight or obese by 2030, costing $950+ billion.
  • Productivity losses related to personal and family health problems cost US Employers $1,685 per employee per year, or $225.8 billion annually.
  • This loss in productivity represents roughly 20% of the payroll.

  • Obese workers files twice as many workers compensation claims as non-obese employees.
  • Obese employees had seven times the medical costs for these claims, averaging $51,019 per 100 workers compared to $7,504 per 100 workers for people with normal BMI.
  • Obese employees lost 13 times as many days per 100 workers compared to 14 days per 100 workers for people with normal BMI.

  • Businesses pay an average of $2,189 in workers compensation costs for smokers, compared to $176 for nonsmokers.
  • Each employee who smokes costs employers $1,897 in lost productivity each year.
  • On average, smokers miss 6.16 days of work per year due to sickness (including smoking related acute and chronic conditions), compared to nonsmokers, who miss 3.86 days of work per year.
  • Employees who take four 10-minute smoking breaks per day actually work one month less per year than workers who don’t take smoking breaks.
  • Construction and maintenance costs are 7% higher in buildings that allow smoking than in buildings that are smoke-free.

As you can see, not only are the bottom-line health insurance costs increase dramatically, but ancillary effects are felt as well.  Workers Compensation costs, lost productivity and absenteeism all affect the bottom line.
The good news is that these are two of the easiest “problems” to fix.

More on Wellness strategies in future blog entries.